- Russia lauds weapons check focusing on previous satellite tv for pc
- U.S. officers, NATO and UK have condemned the check
- Russia denies check posed danger to orbiting spacecraft
MOSCOW, Nov 16 (Reuters) – Russia stated on Tuesday it had performed a weapons check that focused an previous Russian satellite tv for pc with “razor-sharp precision” and denied allegations by the US, Britain and NATO that the check had been harmful for orbiting spacecraft.
NATO Secretary-Normal Jens Stoltenberg stated the check was reckless, posed a risk to the ISS and an orbiting Chinese language spacecraft, and confirmed Russia was creating new weapons programs. A British authorities spokesperson condemned the check and urged Moscow to hitch discussions on the United Nations on “accountable behaviour with regards to area.”
Russia’s Defence Ministry stated the particles from the check had not posed a risk to the ISS, and that Washington knew this.
“We did certainly efficiently check a promising system. It hit the previous satellite tv for pc with razor-sharp precision. The fragments that shaped pose no risk to area exercise,” Defence Minister Sergei Shoigu was quoted as saying by the RIA information company.
The goal was a non-operational spacecraft, Tselina-D, that had been in orbit since 1982, the ministry stated in an announcement.
It stated the US, China and India had performed comparable checks up to now.
Russia’s area company stated the ISS’s crew had briefly to moved into their respective spacecraft.
The Defence Ministry stated Russia was compelled to beef up its defence capabilities due to weapons checks by the US and Washington establishing an area drive in 2020.
Moscow stated it had sought an settlement to cease weapons being deployed in area for years, however that Washington and its allies had blocked the deal on the United Nations.
Reporting by Polina Devitt in Moscow, Sabine Siebold and Robin Emmott in Brussels, Idrees Ali and Steve Gorman in Washington, and Kate Holton in London; writing by Tom Balmforth; Enhancing by Catherine Evans and Timothy Heritage
Our Requirements: The Thomson Reuters Trust Principles.